<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    
    <channel>
    
    <title>PAL Forums</title>
    <link>http://www.professionalartistsleague.org/forums/</link>
    <description>PAL Forums</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-12-17T13:46:56-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Giving Away The Farm &#45; Source Materials are not &#8220;free&#8221;</title>
      <link>http://www.professionalartistsleague.org/forums/viewthread/11/</link>
      <guid>http://www.professionalartistsleague.org/forums/viewthread/11/#When:13:51:01Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The simple reality is that clients who are given source files as a &#8220;bonus&#8221; can and, often times, will take your source files to another less expensive vendor to complete the work.&amp;nbsp; It isn&#8217;t as though clients have limited options.&amp;nbsp; You have done all the groundwork and &#8220;created&#8221; the process for someone else to finish more cheaply. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The result of your generosity is that it allows a less capable designer to take on a new project without having to do ANY of the conceptual work or product development.&amp;nbsp; Then, in addition to getting to bill the client for work they didn&#8217;t create, they also get to learn how to do the work from your source files.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-12-03T13:51:01-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>